One participant close to us described the plenary proceedings as “unprecedented” and “at times tumultuous”. It wasn’t just about the mechanics of the proposal — politics played a significant role, to say the least. In the end, a motion to postpone the finalisation of the IMO NZF by one year carried the day.
Where does this leave us?
Together with our principals, the ship owners, we ship managers had hoped for a single, globally applicable ruleset to meet the strategic objectives of the 2023 IMO GHG Strategy — one that could be implemented smoothly and with minimal administrative burden.
Ship owners require clear and predictable rules to guide their investment decisions. Likewise, ship managers should not be burdened with administering a patchwork of regional regulations that aim for the same goal yet remain unaligned — each with differing definitions, timelines, mechanisms, and, too often, overlapping levies without coordination or an overall cap. This situation benefits no one.
One participant close to us described the plenary proceedings as “unprecedented” and “at times tumultuous.” It wasn’t just about the mechanics of the proposal — politics played a significant role, to say the least. In the end, a motion to postpone the finalisation of the IMO NZF by one year carried the day.