The good, the bad — and the opportunity
On one hand, the outcome in London is disappointing. It prolongs uncertainty for ship owners ready to order new vessels but waiting for regulatory clarity. Meanwhile, ship managers must continue navigating multiple regional rules — with the risk of even more proliferating.
On the other hand, the pause presents an opportunity to refine the proposal. The industry needs a clearer definition of the future IMO compliance framework, particularly given that the NZF would channel substantial financial flows through the IMO. Such financial responsibility demands robust foundations.
Importantly, several industry requests were heard — particularly from certain EU IMO member states — and can now hopefully be debated and addressed constructively. Key points include the role of LNG, appropriate timelines and thresholds, and ensuring that funds generated under the NZF to a certain extend flow back into supporting investment in alternative-fuel technologies and infrastructure.
From the perspective of a ship manager, we can only hope that this extra time leads to meaningful improvement — and ultimately to a framework that is fair, practical, and effective in guiding shipping’s decarbonisation journey. The rest as they say will then be “politics”.